comp.dcom.voice-over-ip
Affichage de l'article :
Re: Difference between Grandstream HT486 and 488

Date : Le 04 octobre 2007
From : headsetadapter.com
Sujet : Re: Difference between Grandstream HT486 and 488

Den,

It depends on what you are going to do. If you just need a telephone line -
get one FXS line ATA and use it. If you will use more complex scenario (for
example, connect FXO port to your land line, and use route pattern to dial
certain numbers through local line), then you will need FXS/FXO ATA.

Good luck,

Mike
CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, Cisco Voice, MCSE W2K, MCSE+I, Security+, etc.
CCIE R&S (in progress), CCIE Voice (in progress)
------
Headset Adapters for Cisco IP Phones
www.ciscoheadsetadapter.com
www.headsetadapter.com



wrote in message
news:1191332749.958303.104630@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> That means I should go for HT488, right?
>
> On 9 28 , 6 01 , "headsetadapter.com" wrote:
>> Dennis,
>>
>> HT486 has only FXS port, while HT488 has FXS and FXO ports.
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> Mike
>> CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, Cisco Voice, MCSE W2K, MCSE+I, Security+, etc.
>> CCIE R&S (in progress), CCIE Voice (in progress)
>> ------
>> Headset Adapters for Cisco IP
>> Phoneswww.ciscoheadsetadapter.comwww.headsetadapter.com
>>
>> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190819888.402791.41590@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Can someone tell me what exactly the difference is between the two ATA
>> > models? It seems to me that both can allow access to PSTN and VoIP
>> > via a single DECT phone, as well as a router to PC.
>>
>> > Moreover, what I want to do is that - when I am outside, I can call my
>> > PSTN home no and specify the call to be transferred to another no (say
>> > in another country) via VoIP. Can either HT486 or HT488, both serve
>> > the above purpose?
>>
>> > If not, any other models can do this?
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dennis- -
>>
>> - -
>
>

Posez vos questions, réponses et remarques sur les forums de FrameIP